Course-of-construction coverage for California projects — structured around the wildfire and wildland-urban-interface exposure, seismic risk, and post-fire flood and mudslide hazard that standard builders risk forms exclude.
California is one of the hardest builders risk environments in the country, and it’s the catastrophe exposure — not licensing — that makes it hard. A project under construction here can sit in a wildfire-prone wildland-urban interface, on seismically active ground, and below a recently burned slope that now floods. Each of those perils is typically excluded or restricted on a standard course-of-construction form. Here’s what that means for your coverage.
Wildfire is the defining California construction-property peril, and a build in progress is uniquely exposed: open framing, stacked lumber, and no completed fire-resistive envelope. Standard builders risk forms cover fire, but carriers underwrite — and frequently restrict or decline — projects in high-hazard wildfire and wildland-urban-interface (WUI) zones, which is exactly where much of California’s new construction and post-fire rebuilding happens.
The state has been reshaping its fire-insurance market in response. The California Department of Insurance publishes wildfire resources and has issued bulletins and a moratorium framework after recent catastrophic fires. For a course-of-construction risk in a brush or WUI area, the practical answer is often a specialty or Excess & Surplus (E&S) market that will write the fire exposure the standard market backs away from.
California sits on active fault systems, and earthquake is excluded from essentially every standard builders risk form. For a structure mid-construction — before shear walls, bracing, and connections are fully in place — seismic loss can be severe, and on many projects the construction lender or owner contract will require earthquake coverage to be added back.
The Department of Insurance maintains earthquake insurance resources explaining how the peril is handled. We add a difference-in-conditions or quake endorsement where the project warrants it, rather than letting an “all-risk” label create a false sense that the shake exposure is covered.
California’s perils compound. A site below a recently burned slope faces debris flow and mudslide; flood and earth movement are separate exclusions on the base form. The state groups these hazards together in its catastrophe guidance:
Tell us about your operation and your loss history — we’ll confirm we can write California and structure the limits to match.